CP2000 is the automated underreporter notice — the IRS information return (W-2, 1099, K-1) disagrees with the line on the return you filed. The draft response reconciles every prior-year line against the IRS number, attaches the corresponding IRC §-citation per line, and ships to the firm owner for a final accept / modify / reject decision before anything leaves the office. Owner-reviewed response is what the engagement file carries — not a draft the AI produces on its own.
30-day response windowIRS notice responsefor solo CPAs and EAs responding under their firm's PTIN.
The listed notice examples run through a four-step owner-reviewed workflow. Available source context and review decisions can be shown in the configured workflow; the practitioner remains responsible for the response and signature. Taxerity.AI is a drafting tool, not the signer.
- Seven notice types — CP2000, CP504, CP523, Letter 566, Letter 569, LT11, CP91 — all routed through the same owner-reviewed workflow.
- Every line carries an IRC §-citation and a substantiation question; the audit log recovers who accepted, modified, or rejected each.
- Per-engagement scope is set at intake. No fee unless the firm files a response. Pro subscription is Professional $149 per month; cancel anytime.
What we handle
Seven notice types. One owner-reviewed workflow.
Listed notice types route through the same four-step review (intake, classify, workpaper, owner-reviewed response draft) with available source context and configured decision records. The severity pill on each card is the response posture — Routine for no-deadline-flow, Standard for the typical 30-day window, Time-sensitive for the 21-day window or installment-agreement default.
CP504 is a balance-due reminder; the IRS has a record of an unpaid balance and is asking the client to pay or respond before the next escalation step (usually a levy notice). The platform captures the notice as a counsel-on-record row, reconciles against the firm-ledger balance, and surfaces the right escalation path — pay, dispute, installment agreement, currently-not-collectible — back to the firm owner for a final decision.
30-day response windowCP523 means an existing installment agreement is in default and the IRS is about to terminate it. The response window is shorter than for routine notices, so the platform flags the notice as CP523-class on intake, marks the engagement high-urgency, and short-circuits the response schedule so the owner-reviewed response ships before the termination date. Termination reverts the balance to standard collection posture, so fixing the default now is materially less expensive than reinstatement later.
21-day response windowLetter 566 is the information-request stage of an exam; the IRS is gathering facts on a return before deciding whether to open a full audit. The response collects the requested documents under engagement scope, attaches an IRC §-citation per asserted position, and ships the owner-reviewed response package before the deadline. The audit log captures every document exchanged with the IRS, including the firm owner who signed off on each response package before transmission.
30-day response windowLetter 569 is the third-party contact letter — the IRS has communicated with a person or entity outside the firm about the client (a bank, a 1099-issuer, a former spouse, a co-investor). The response confirms scope and authority, requests clarification on the third-party contact log, and ships an owner-reviewed package back to the IRS. The platform captures the third-party contact reference so the firm can show later who was contacted, when, and under what authority.
30-day response windowLT11 is the Notice of Intent to Levy — the IRS intends to seize wages, bank accounts, or federal payments unless the firm responses within the short window. The response is high urgency and routes through the same four-step review workflow (intake to owner-reviewed response draft), with the levy-clock date surfaced on every card so the firm owner sees the deadline before the response ships. CDP / Collection Due Process hearing requests, where appropriate, surface inline as one of the visible options.
21-day response windowCP91 is the intent-to-seize-state-refund notice; the IRS plans to redirect a forthcoming state refund to satisfy an outstanding federal balance. The response is mid-urgency and narrower than LT11 in scope, but the response still routes through the firm owner for sign-off and the audit log captures the state-refund offset reference so the client has one record to share with the state taxing authority.
30-day response windowThe workflow
Four steps. One owner-review checkpoint.
Each step in the IRS-notice response is short, deliberate, and bounded — the platform does not transmit to the IRS at any point; the firm's PTIN stays on the response across all four.
CP2000 · form OCR · IRC §-section alignment
- IRS line vs. filed line
- Third-party form vs. original
- Engagement record vs. audit log
workpaper · IRC §-citations · substantiation queue · owner-pending: 3 of 7
- Owner queue: accept / modify / reject
- Firm-PTIN-signed response draft
01 · Section
Where does Circular 230 liability sit when the AI flags something
The practitioner remains responsible for professional judgment, supervision, and the filing decision; the product is not professional approval or a substitute for advice.
Where does Circular 230 professional liability sit when the AI flags something on a return?
Taxerity.AI presents a draft for the practitioner to accept, modify, or reject; it does not sign a return, provide professional approval, or replace the practitioner’s judgment. Any duties under Circular 230 or other professional rules remain with the practitioner, who should obtain qualified advice about the engagement and filing.
02 · Section
What consent language do I use with clients before pulling their data
Supported intake paths can record an engagement consent step before a pull. That product control is not a legal conclusion; have qualified advisers review any disclosure or consent language.
What consent language do I use with my clients before the scanner pulls their data?
Some intake paths record a disclosure/consent step before a return is read. This is an implementation detail, not a statement that a firm satisfies IRC §7216 or any other obligation. A qualified tax or legal adviser should determine the required notices, consents, downstream uses, and retention policy for your engagement.
Engagement pricing
Per-engagement scope is set at intake — and the platform subscription is unchanged.
| Tier | Shape | What's included |
|---|---|---|
| Per-engagement scope | Scoped per notice | Citation, substantiation, response draft, and owner-review — all on the same per-engagement record. Quote at intake so the firm knows the scope before any work begins. |
| No fee unless we file | No fee without a response | If the firm decides not to file a response after intake — a paid-in-full balance, an OIC acceptance, a not-collectible determination — there is no per-engagement fee. |
| Platform subscription | Professional $149 / month | Same Pro subscription /pricing surfaces — base platform, scanner, owner-review queue, audit log, and ProConnect / UltraTax / Lacerte / CCH Axcess / OLT Pro integrations. |
Per-engagement scope is set at intake; the platform subscription is unchanged.
Have a CP2000 / LT11 on the desk? →
A 15-minute walkthrough of the notice-response workflow on a real engagement — no deck, no commitment. Pricing stays on the matching Pro tier once you're ready. Start with a 14-day free trial of the base platform first.